Environmental Protection for Sale and Pollution Noncompliance-- Evidence
from the United States (Thesis)
- How Enforcement Policy Affects Firms`
Environmental Behavior (Chapter 2)
Abstract:
I take into account the endogeneity of
environmental policy resulting from political pressure and revisit the
effect of environmental enforcement policy on firms'
compliance/noncompliance behavior. A modified Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes
(1995) econometric strategy is employed to derive the industry-level
empirical specification based on microfoundations of firms' rational
behavior. Strong evidence is found that inspection rates reduce violation
rates. The deterrent effect could be underestimated if the endogeneity of
policy at the industry level is ignored. The calculated elasticities of
violation with respect to enforcement policy vary across industries.
- How Environmental Regulation is Determined
in a Political Context (Chapter 3)
Abstract:
This work addresses the issue of what
determines the level of environmental political protection. Using Grossman
and Helpman's (1994) framework, I show theoretically that the level of
protection mimics a Ramsey rule dependent on damage multiplier and
elasticity of violation. Empirical regressions show that both of them have effects
on the inspection rate that proxies the protection level. In particular,
there is a strong complementary effect between damage multiplier and
elasticity of violation in determining the inspection rate. The estimated effects are consistent with the
prediction for most industries.
- Determinants of Environmental Political
Contribution (Chapter 4)
Abstract: This work investigates
whether firms behave systematically in choosing their levels of
environmental political effort. Political contributions presented
exclusively for environmental issues are constructed to measure firms'
environmental political activity for the first time. For this paper's
purposes, damage multiplier and elasticity of violation are considered
to be benefit determinants of the political activity, given their effects on
enforcement policy in Chapter Three. Moreover, I propose that input shares
that affect the stake given certain protection level are also determinants.
Empirical evidence is found to confirm the conjectures.